Katie i remember when chat-admin signed in that day, i was online. jugs and i began to ask about admins to get rid of the flooding. within a couple of days, both of us were admins for that purpose. that is no longer the purpose, apparantly.
the chat was more fun when it wasn't dictated what could be said in the chat, it even says 'There is no censorship on this chatroom. (Except for the swearword filter)'
Yesterday, 15:41
Jaime Michael Scarlett you are smarter than this.. There are many fallacies in your logic. The ignore button exists for the mere purpose of ignoring someone.. Jugador gets mad when someone directs an insult at him, hence he hahould ignore them, but instead he bans that person because he is a coward. That is completely different when referring to the issue of Santiago. When someone is arguing and insulting someone else they should just be ignored. It is pointless to have 5 moderators who all do it differently. It is somewhat misguiding.. Also I don't give flooders access to that chat. I remember one time being banned for challenging a moderator's knowledge on a certain subject and my IP was later banned, it just proves that your "system" of judgement is bogus. I agree with Hector, Tammy and Sigz.. So Chata I would be at the top of your list to be banned based on my character?? Lol get a life
Yesterday, 18:00
Kasia/ chatadicta/ scarlett Yes, you would. Your being here is a proof I don't ban just because I don't like someone. Simple as that.
Todos nos manejamos mejor o peor con lo estándar de un idioma, pero hay ciertas cosas que cuesta más aprender, como las expresiones hechas y el argot....